MLaTPW Part III: Gratitude

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

[This is the third — and final! — post in the My Life and The Pioneer Woman series. Here are direct links to Part I and Part II.]

I feel like I don’t read at all anymore (though I do still aspire to someday getting back to that life that I once knew) but back when I did read, one of my areas of interest was sociology/social psychology — books that explain how people think, how people see and understand the world, and why people behave in the ways they do (which is often not rational and can work against one’s own self-interest). Sometimes knowing why you think or act the way you do doesn’t actually help anything, but sometimes it does.

Two of the books I read that I liked were Stumbling Upon Happiness by Daniel Gilbert and The Paradox of Choice by Barry Schwartz. Both of them deal with how people feel about their lives and what factors contribute to those feelings, and while there is some overlap between the books — in many cases they use the same studies to illustrate points — they are coming from different angles. Stumbling Upon Happiness focuses more broadly on how we feel, what makes us happy and why things we expect to make us happy often don’t, while The Paradox of Choice focuses specifically on how making choices impacts how we feel about our lives, and provides concrete steps people can take to increase satisfaction with the choices they make and their lives in general. Both books are worth reading.

One of the things that Barry Schwartz talks about in The Paradox of Choice is how a key factor that leads to unhappiness is comparing yourself to others and focusing on what you don’t have that you think your life is missing, instead of on what you do have that you makes your life better. (“When life is not too good, we think a lot about how it could be better. When life is going well, we tend to not think much about how it could be worse.”)

Which brings me to The Pioneer Woman.

Aspirational blogs like The Pioneer Woman are similar to lifestyle magazines like Real Simple or Martha Stewart Living (not to mention all of the advertising we are constantly bombarded with, from television, radio, magazines, websites…) in that they are designed to make you focus on what you don’t have and think about how your life would be better if you had A or B, or did X or Y.

One of the main tools Ree Drummond uses to drive traffic to her site and generate page views is product giveaways. She gives away everything from flowy tops from her closet to Kitchen-Aid mixers to high-end SLR digital cameras. Product giveaways on her site generate up to 10,000 comments, and are a key part of her business strategy.

As noted, her site is aspirational, she is creating a brand, and her site is designed to make you compare your life to hers. (Or at least to her life at it is presented on the blog — whether or not that is her actual life is an open question.) It causes you to think about what she has that you don’t, and to hope that you might get a little piece of that when she gives some of it away.

But generally, getting something like that will not make you happy. It may make you feel good for a little while, but there is likely to be no real long-term benefit, due to what Barry Schwartz refers to it as “the ubiquitous feature of human psychology[,] … a process known as adaptation.”

As Schwartz describes it:

Simply put, we get used to things, and then we start to take them for granted…. When I first got cable TV, I was ecstatic about the reception and excited about all the choices it provided (many fewer than today). Now I moan when the cable goes out and I complain about the paucity of attractive programs…. Because of adaptation, enthusiasm about positive experiences doesn’t sustain itself.

You end up on what researchers have dubbed the “hedonic treadmill.” You buy things that make you happy, and then you get used to them, so you buy more things — bigger, better, faster things. The cycle can go on indefinitely, but you’re never really happier than you were before. How much nicer is the car you drive now than the first car you owned? It’s probably a lot nicer. Are you happier with it? Probably not. Were you happier after the vacation in Europe than you were after the camping trip? Were your friends more interested in looking at your pictures? (Umm … no, they were not.)

There’s a constant escalation of purchases and activities, yet you are left at the same level of happiness. (I think it actually might better be called the “hedonic stairmaster” — you’re climbing and climbing yet not getting any higher.)

One strategy for getting around this that is not discussed in either book but that I have found to be generally effective is to consciously limit your purchases. If you  buy only things you need or truly want — after much thought and trying alternatives and seeing how it is to live without them — they will in fact make you happy when you get them. For instance I had a wood stove installed in my office last year and I love my wood stove with all my heart, it was the best sixteen hundred dollars I ever spent. I also continue to love the Terry road bike I bought in 1992, and my down comforter, and the hand-me-down cowboy boots my friend Rah gave me….

So I’m not going to say that things can’t bring joy, they can. But most things don’t, and the more things you buy, the less likely it is that any one of them will make you happy.

One of the reasons I love my wood stove and bike so much is because it took me forever to talk myself into getting them, and I spent a significant amount of time without them, thinking about what to do. When I finally did get them, I really, really appreciated them. And even now, when I use them, I remember what it was like to not have them, which makes me continue to value them highly.

So that’s my own personal strategy for making sure that things I get live up to expectations — don’t get very much, and only get things you really want.

Another strategy is the one outlined in The Paradox of Choice, which is to practice gratitude — to consciously spend time thinking about how much better things are than they could be, reflecting on what parts of your life bring you joy and satisfaction, and taking time to note what you do have that you love and value.

As Schwartz explains:

Finally, we can remind ourselves to be grateful for what we have. This may seem trite, the sort of thing one hears from parents or ministers, and then ignores. But individuals who regularly experience and express gratitude are physically healthier, more optimistic about the future, and feel better about their lives than those who do not. Individuals who experience gratitude are more alert, enthusiastic, and energetic than those who do not, and they are more likely to achieve personal goals.

And unlike adaptation, the experience of gratitude is something we can affect directly. Experiencing and expressing gratitude actually gets easier with practice. By causing us to focus on how much better our lives are than they could have been, or were before, the disappointment that adaptation bring in its wake can be blunted.

(To support these conclusions, he cites the work of Professor Robert Emmons at UC Davis, a leading researcher in the field.)

So the next time you are tempted to go read The Pioneer Woman as a way to escape from the tedium of your day-to-day life, thinking it will be a little break that will make you feel better, you should instead practice experiencing gratitude for what you do have.

Schwartz even gives advice on how to do that. He recommends the practice of  keeping a gratitude journal, adopting a simple routine:

1. Keep a notepad at your bedside.
2. Every morning, when you wake up, or every night, when you go to bed, use the notepad to list five things that happened that you’re grateful for.

As Schwartz notes, “These objects of gratitude occasionally will be big (a job promotion, a great first date), but most of the time, they will be small (sunlight streaming in through the bedroom window, a kind word from a friend, a piece of swordfish cooked just the way you like it, an informative article in a magazine).”

He also says that you will likely feel silly or self-conscious when you start doing this, and you may have trouble thinking of things. But the more you do it, the easier it will get, and the more natural it will feel.

You also may find yourself discovering many things to be grateful for on even the most ordinary of days. Finally, you may find yourself feeling better and better about your life as it is, and less and less driven to find the ‘new and improved’ products and activities that will enhance it.

So the bottom line is … stop comparing your life to everyone else’s … stop thinking about what you don’t have that you “need” … and start thinking about what you do have that you love. It will become a self-perpetuating cycle, the more you do it, the better you’ll feel, and the more you’ll be aware of that you are grateful for, which will make you feel even better.

The End.

(And this is the last time I will write a post about The Pioneer Woman. I promise.)

9 Responses to “MLaTPW Part III: Gratitude”

  1. Ruby Leigh Says:

    I sooo enjoyed the MLaTPW series, and won’t even mind if you want to talk about the PW again.

    I’ll admit that I enjoy the PW “cooking” blog as a resource on “hearty home-cooking”, and have to say that I’ve used a couple of the recipes with rave reviews. As I understand though they are not all hers originally. However, I have long lost interest on anything else she was doing (probably sometime around the “Lodge Renovation”). I simply don’t find people that “have it all” all that interesting.

  2. lessisenough Says:

    Thanks!

    It’s funny, I’ve read mixed things about her recipes. Most of them have a horrifying amount of butter and cream and things like that, it’s apparently very Paula Deen-esque, though one of the worst were mashed potatoes that had like two or three sticks of butter, a package of cream cheese, and half-and-half in them and people on PWSux were like oh my god that is disgusting except one person was like okay I’ve had those before and they were to die for (possibly literally, it all just seems like a heart attack waiting to happen).

    Her bread recipe that inspired the original Pie Near post was a loaf of french bread, cut in half, with A STICK OF BUTTER SPREAD ON EACH HALF, broiled until blackened. People were like okay did she just put up a recipe for burnt toast … with two sticks of butter? (Here’s the Pie Near version for those who are interested.)

    So I haven’t actually seen many of her recipes, I’ve just read about the ones that are completely over the top, which has sort of biased me against them.

  3. Ruby Leigh Says:

    I don’t watch Paula Dean, but from what I gather I would agree that Ree Drummond is in the same camp. I can appreciate a style of cooking that holds appreciation for heavy cream and butter as long as it’s not your only trick…the jury is still out on PW.

    I never made “The Bread” and indeed it was seriously called that, and the parody recipe is not too far off. Personally, I don’t think of buttering bread and then toasting it into oblivion as a recipe per say. Do I really need instructions to indulge and then make mistakes?

    However, in fairness, “her” version of Green Bean casserole and Pasta Bake are pretty good.


  4. I think I’m going to work on this Gratitude Journaling idea. The benefits sound like what I’m looking for.

  5. lessisenough Says:

    Well I have to confess that I haven’t actually tried it, but it makes sense to me. You can let me know if it helps. Seems like it can’t hurt.

  6. laura Says:

    how will you discuss the relevants on the statement: “…
    but individuals who regularly experience and express gratitude are physically healthier, more optimistic about the future, and feel better about their lives than those who do not. Individuals who experience gratitude are more alert, enthusiastic, and energetic than those who do not, and they are more likely to achieve personal goals”

  7. lessisenough Says:

    Thanks for the comment. I’m not sure if I understand the question. That statement comes from a book by Barry Schwarz called The Paradox of Choice, in which he talks about the value of expressing gratitude. His information comes from studies done by other researchers on the subject.

  8. frederica987 Says:

    Hm, I don’t see how reading The Pioneer Woman would cause so much desire for more. She posts really simple recipes – so most reader can pride themselves of being able to cook better than her – and while she may be loaded and use expensive cookware, it does not really show. She wants to present herself as living a “simple” live, although of course she does not, but in my opinion that is exactly the charm of the blog. Reader who truly do live a simpler live, do not have too much money, don’t need to feel inferior reading that blog.
    She has a way of sharing her more expensive experiences, though, that may make me wonder but not make me jealous or unsatisfied. There was a post where she talked about being on vacation etc. and leaving her camera at home so she bought one that was the price of my camera for which I had to save a couple of months. This was not related in a way that frustrated me, but rather made me wonder what person would spend about $700 for a “camera for one day”.
    She could have used different words that would have left people like me frustrated or jealous, but it was really presented such a casual way that it only left me wondering. She obviously just wanted to talk about that vacation and not show off. I believe this kind of presentation draws her readers without causing jealousy or frustration.
    The only aspect of her blog that really left me frustrated is her food, which seem to be the same most of the time and contains a lot of convenience products, even complete cake mixes. That’s not really the kind of food I am looking for when reading a food blog!

  9. lessisenough Says:

    Thanks for your comment. I seemed to have gotten all of my Pioneer Woman feelings out when I wrote these posts, so I don’t have too much more to say about it at this point.

    I think it’s good that you are able take her writings at face value, not get caught up in the pro or con side of it, and just read it for entertainment or enjoyment. Obviously the problems with reading her and being unsatisfied with one’s life aren’t caused by reading The Pioneer Woman, it comes from inside, so you sound like someone who is generally happy and well balanced, and you are able to read her without it making you wish your life was different or having any of the things come up that other people sometimes struggle with. And that is good.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s